You claimed that the enforcer was a jerk right?
But if I cs’ed a merc claim you would say that too right?
Isn’t it true this mercenary claim (pkr) was actually sellsword?
And isn’t it true sellsword is against town right?
So it would have been in MY best interest to get all the merc claim out correct?
And scum could also fake claim neuts too because there is room right?
So why would I take the chance allowing a scum neut / scum team member live for the price of a neutral I don’t care about when my defend would only kill me?
Fool claim flipped demon right?
Isn’t it true the NK could have claimed a neut role and bypassed bd right?
Side Note II:
You are a pretender right?
And your job is to become king which entails killing the king right?
But this king could be town king?
Isn’t it true that you could be killing a town king for the purpose of your selfish neut reasons and your selfish winning purposes even if it impeded on town’s chances of winning?
Isn’t it a fact that you aren’t always pro- town because you really don’t know whether the king is good or evil but has a 65% chance of siding with town?
And isn’t it is more likely it would side with town than scum?
I think my cs’s were justified and I do not regret my actions. I play to ensure my I win. Tbh idc if anyone else wins besides me. So “defeat any neutrals who stand in your way” if I think you stand in my way I should defeat you correct?
I think you are wrong. From a townie POV I did the right thing. So…