I think squid may be murderer
Did you not read through the rulebook?
Associate/murderer will try to throw us off
The best way to counteract this is by not being too influenced by them
The clue likely only pointed to the murderer though, so one of you may still be the accomplice
I never called wine juice?
You acted like I called juice Gender indicative which is false, I only called Wine Gender associated
Welp, the card is RNG generated, and having much of the card pointing to the solution of the case didn’t make you a murderer or accomplice
What? I don’t understand what you’re trying to say
I only said that it’s possible/likely
Then what the heck does this even mean
Then why did you mention juice in a sentence that had no mention of it itself?
That squid could be murderer since she has female clues and that i don’t want to be swayed by her? Never said it was guaranteed, so I’ll still oisten to her… Are you the accomplice? Trying to throw us off Squid’s trail?
What does mentioning juice have to do with anything
Besides, I only mentioned it bc you guys were talking about it…
I don’t think I myself have ever mentioned juice, however, you can correct me if I’m wrong
You literally mentioned it in this post
Nah, just pointing out that having much of clue/means card that points toward the solution of the case doesn’t make them murderer or accomplice
Anyway, what if the marker placed by Marl is pointing that the murderer is a woman
THEN WHY WOULD MARL CHOOSE THAT AS THE CLUE???
LITERALLY DID YOU EVEN READ THE RULES
Possible, BUT THE CLUES ARE STILL IMPORTANT
Besides, marl probably wouldn’t do that this early
That would make it pointless as it wouldn’t mention the possible clues and/or means