Official Site | Discord | Steam | Twitter | Reddit | Twitch | FB | YouTube | Wikia

Cult Alts - still necessary?


#41

In short, rn the Apostle is kind of busted as each Apostle can essentially give the Cult two more votes via Sponsor and Pull Rank. Having a starting EK only added to that broken mess.


#42

Wait.

Imagine if there was 3 apostles


#43

2 would be enough, unless Sponsor+Pull Rank allows for triple voting.


#44

3 apostles
EK
1 warlock
1 sellsword
1 CL

11


#45

That’s 11 votes


#46

14 votes. You miscounted.


#47

14 seems balanced
Yep


#48

Cult Alts are fun though, just nerf then.

They don’t need to be taken away.


#49

Noble will be losing both pull rank and sponsor


#50

What.


#51

What are you giving it instead


#52

The only problem that match was that each Noble!Apostle meant that the Cult had two more free votes. This added to the fact that we had 2 scumsiding neuts and an EK made the game a landslide for the Cult.


#53

Still planning a replacement for Sponsor, but imo Pull Rank should just silently add another vote for execution / pardon. (Not announced unless it makes a difference in the outcome so it’s hard to prove)


#54

Seriously, we managed to quicklynch the revived Prince with only 2 BD dead. How is that not broken?


#55

Marl you do know that pull rank is useless then right?
If you don’t have enough people to put someone on trial you probably lost


#56

True
But it’s better than no day ability at all


#57

Blue Dragon will usually have disagreements
Trials can be close, even though they usually aren’t